Award: OCE-1041244

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE The OMEGAS (Ocean Margin Ecosystems Group for Acidification Studies) Consortium conducts field and laboratory experiments across a network of 10 near-shore ocean acidification monitoring sites that span 1,400 kilometers of the coastline. UCSC maintains 2-3 of these sites. By combining experiments with a sensor network that continuously measures ocean pH changes, the OMEGAS researchers examine the sensitivity and potential resilience to ocean acidification among mussel populations that are spread along the west coast of the United States. The researchers focus much of their attention on a mussel, Mytilus californianus, a widespread component of the rocky intertidal zone and an important test subject for understanding ocean chemistry changes. Our research included five integrated elements. 1) To document the oceanographic context in which the study organisms live, we proposed to build upon two local-scale NSF-funded networks of sensors (in Oregon and northern California) to quantify carbonate chemistry in four regions of the CCLME with contrasting upwelling regimes, and thus, likely a wide range of differences in carbonate chemistry. Based on NOAA surveys, we hypothesized that ocean acidification (OA) should be most intense in northern California and Oregon, less intense in central California, and least intense in the Santa Barbara channel, east of Point Conception. 2) To examine physiological, genomic, and genetic mechanisms underlying acclimatization and adaptation to OA conditions, we proposed coordinated and integrated studies of adults and larvae of sea urchins and mussels collected from each of two sites within each of the four regions (see Fig. 1 for design layout). In common-garden experiments using NSF funded laboratory mesocosms at UCSB and UCD-BML, we proposed to culture sea urchin and mussel larvae under different CO2 and temperature regimes, and to use genomics techniques to determine the tolerance of larvae to present and future OA conditions. 3) To determine evolutionary responses and adaptational potential to OA, we proposed to conduct genetic surveys urchins and mussels across the 8 sites and to relate detected variability to the oceanographic conditions quantified by our mooring network. 4) To examine ecological responses to OA, we monitoredr growth and shell accretion rates of mussels transplanted to eight intertidal and seven mooring sites in the field in relation to oceanographic and physical conditions in spring/summer 2011 and 2012. 5) To leverage complementary funding for research, training and outreach, and to engage undergraduates, graduate students, and postdoctoral researchers in the research as well as the PIs. Part of our overall goal was to increase the visibility and familiarity of science for policy makers and the general public. Outreach was to be facilitated through our extensive ties to COMPASS (Communication Partnership for Science and the Sea), public lectures, websites, short video format micro documentaries (see Short Attention Span Science Theatre, http://microdocs.org), and multimedia outlets such as films and television. We argued that our study would pioneer the way towards new, integrative approaches to investigation of the response of ecologically important calcifiers to the impacts of OA in an upwelling-dominated coastal ecosystem. Last Modified: 02/11/2014 Submitted by: Peter T Raimondi