Dataset: Morphological Characteristics of Oysters from Predator Experiments at the Dauphin Island Sea Lab, AL, May-July 2019

Oyster culturing
Oysters (Crassostrea virginica) were cultured as spat-on-shell at the Auburn University Shellfish Laboratory (AUSL) on Dauphin Island, AL starting in late May 2019 using standard techniques (Congrove et al. 2009). Oyster larvae were settled onto sun-bleached oyster shells to create spat-on-shell. After 3 days, when oyster spat were approximately 1.0 millimeters, they were exposed to either exudate from predatory blue crabs or empty cage controls in four flow-through holding tanks (length = 2.4 meters, width = 0.9 meters, water depth = 0.4 meters) supplied with unfiltered seawater pumped directly from the Gulf of Mexico. The number of spat per shell varied from approximately 5 – 40 and we elected to not alter the initial density to mimic natural settlement during the induction period. Oysters were suspended above the tank bottom in oyster aquaculture baskets (64 x 23 x 14 centimeters with 140 spat-covered per shells basket) to prevent sediment buildup from suffocating oysters. Seven oyster baskets were present in each tank (28 total).

Spat were exposed to blue crab predator cues by holding four live caged adult blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) in two of the tanks (8 crabs total), whereas the remaining two tanks contained empty cages (control) to mimic conditions where oysters regularly experience predator cues or are limited in their exposure from cues. Water volumes and crab densities were informed from established procedures (Belgrad et al. 2021). Crabs in each tank were held in four separate cages (32 x 23 x 14 centimeters) to prevent crabs from consuming the experimental oysters or each other. Every crab was fed one adult oyster daily (approximately 5.0 centimeters in length) to maximize predator cue intensity as experimental oysters would be exposed to exudates from predators and damaged conspecifics. This ensured that oysters were exposed to the most natural set of cues indicative of a predation event, which produces a strong response in oysters (Scherer et al. 2016). Crabs were replaced during the experiment as needed due to mortality. Experimental oyster baskets were rotated around the crab cages daily to reduce differences in oyster growth due to proximity to predator cues, and no differences among cages were found. The induction period was 2 months.

Shell morphology measurements
We sampled subsets of oysters to confirm that our predator cue treatments were causing control and induced oysters to exhibit different shell morphologies. Two shells were taken from every basket and three live spat were chosen from each shell for measuring spat shell characteristics after two months (number of individuals = 84 for each cue exposure treatment; 56 shells and 168 spat total). Spat shell properties were assessed by measuring shell size and shell crushing force. Oysters are roughly round at these early life stages, and we measured the shell length from the umbo to the outer shell edge to the nearest 0.01 mm using digital calipers. We took care to only measure individuals that were not bounded by cohorts to reduce any confounding effects on growth due to space limitation.

The force required to break each spat shell was quantified by a penetrometer attached to a charge amplifier (Kistler force sensor 9203 and Kistler charge amplifier 5995). The sensor probe was placed in the center of the shell, perpendicular to the shell surface. Gentle, consistent pressure was applied until the shell cracked, and the maximum force applied by the sensor to break the shell (N) was recorded. We divided shell crushing force by shell length to produce a size-standardized metric of shell strength (i.e., standardized crushing force, N per millimeter) because larger individuals naturally have a stronger shell as a byproduct of their larger size (shell thickness).

Oyster shells had their soft tissue removed and were placed in a drying oven for 48 hours at 70 degrees celsius to obtain the shell dry weight.