File(s) | Type | Description | Action |
---|---|---|---|
914147_v1_biometrics.csv (105.64 KB) | Comma Separated Values (.csv) | Primary data file for dataset ID 914147, version 1 | Download |
This experiment compares the ciliated band length to the protein content of eight species of echinoderm larvae. The data was collected between 2020 and 2022 in the laboratory at California State University, Long Beach.
Study Summary: The feeding larvae of echinoderms take two distinct forms: plutei (echinoids, ophiuroids), which have calcified skeletal rods supporting long, slender arms bearing the ciliated band, and non-plutei (asteroids, holothuroids), where the ciliated band is borne on rounded lobes of tissue that do not contain skeletal rods. Feeding larvae of all four classes of echinoderms are known to alter the length of their ciliated bands in response to food ration, with larvae fed low rations producing longer ciliated bands relative to body size than larvae fed high rations. Prior work suggests that the structural cost of adding a given length of ciliated band might be lower for plutei than for non-plutei, which might affect the scope for phenotypic plasticity in ciliated band length in the two types of larvae.
In this study we test the hypothesis that plutei and support a greater length of ciliated band per unit biomass than non-plutei by comparing ciliated band length and protein content of larvae of eight species (with at least one species from each echinoderm class that includes feeding larvae) at two timepoints in early development.
Steiner, B., Pernet, B. (2024) Quantification of ciliated band length per unit protein in early echinoderm larvae (biometirc data), collected between 2020 and 2022 in the laboratory at California State University, Long Beach.. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). (Version 1) Version Date 2024-04-10 [if applicable, indicate subset used]. doi:10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.914147.1 [access date]
Terms of Use
This dataset is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
If you wish to use this dataset, it is highly recommended that you contact the original principal investigators (PI). Should the relevant PI be unavailable, please contact BCO-DMO (info@bco-dmo.org) for additional guidance. For general guidance please see the BCO-DMO Terms of Use document.